Reasonable doubt stands as the fundamental pillar that protects the rights of accused service members at a court-martial. It serves not only as a legal standard to ensure a fair and just process but also as a safeguard against the potential for wrongful convictions. 

The military judges in the different military services give different definitions for reasonable doubt to their panels (juries).  Both the Army and the Coast Guard judges tell the panel that a “reasonable doubt is a fair and reasonable hypothesis other than that of guilt.”  In other words, Soldiers and Coasties are instructed that if there is another rational innocent explanation for the facts, they must acquit.  Meanwhile, the Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps use other language telling the panel that they must be “firmly convinced” or similar language in order to convict.

Reasonable doubt is the highest standard of proof used in criminal trials, requiring that the evidence presented must leave the jurors with a firm belief in the defendant’s guilt. If there is any reasonable uncertainty, the jury is instructed to acquit. This standard recognizes the gravity of depriving someone of their freedom, or worse, their life, and requires that the evidence be overwhelmingly convincing.

The reason for the reasonable doubt burden on the prosecution being so high is because of the consequences of a court-martial conviction.  If you are convicted at a court-martial, you could lose your retirement, practically all benefits of your military service, go to prison for years, have to register as a sex offender; and, in a capital trial, lose your life.  

The reasonable doubt standard ultimately unites with the presumption of innocence to create a sound defense at a court-martial.  The presumption of innocence means that no matter how many bad things are said about you, you are innocent and remain innocent until (and only if) the court-martial president says “Guilty.”  And the court-martial panel is only allowed to say “Guilty” if the prosecution has presented evidence proving your guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.  It’s my job as your attorney to make it clear that they didn’t and couldn’t meet that burden.

Sometimes I see military prosecutors proudly proclaim to the panel: “I’m Major or Lieutenant Commander so and so, and we represent the United States.”  When this happens, I get up after and say to the panel “actually it is you that represents the United States and it is your job to apply the presumption of innocence and the reasonable doubt standard that our country requires.”

In a court-martial the stakes are incredibly high for you, the reasonable doubt standard is everything when it comes to protecting your innocence.

Comments are disabled.